|
|
|
|
|
by Quekid5
1665 days ago
|
|
> I have no idea how that porting speed would translate to a larger project IME it doesn't. I'm not at liberty to discuss all that much detail, but I what I can say is: This was a mixture of C and C++ -> Scala. This was pretty ancient code which used goto fairly liberally, etc. so it would often require quite a lot of control flow rewriting -- that take a looooong time. I'd be lucky to get through a single moderately complex multiply nested loop per day. (Scala may be a bit of an outlier here because it doesn't offer a c-like for loop, nor does it offer a "native" break statement.) |
|