|
|
|
|
|
by koheripbal
1663 days ago
|
|
In your example, the Godel number works out to be the same when you multiply them out - but your underlying point is valid that the assignment of primes to variables and operators cannot be as arbitrary as Godel used them as. ...a better example is just "x 1". You could add that ad infinitum to any equation and it cannot change the meaning of the outputted Godel number. ...but remember that getting a different result does not mean the interpretation of the Godel number is different. For example, multiples of ten are also even. 64 and 9 are different numbers, but they are both perfect squares. ...and the goal is to find something descriptive of the resultant number - not the number itself. ...but that's one of the main areas to explore. There are different types of primes to experiment with to see if anything meaningful can be discovered. |
|
Your idea smells like wishful thinking.