[physicsgraph]

I'm not sure I follow what you're proposing, but in case it is tangentially related to a project I work on, I'll describe what I did.

Write down every quantitative expression in Mathematical Physics. Assign a unique numerical ID to each expression. Identify the relations between each of the expressions to create a graph. Does that graph feature any patterns? Is there a path from any expression to every other expression?

[koheripbal]

Rather than a numeric ID, the variables as well as the operations are represented by primes, as Godel described.

The resulting number's geometric properties might provide some insight into the properties of the original system.

The trick is figuring out which primes to use initially, and how to interpret the resulting number.

....but my gut tells me there is something there.

[webmaven]

The only reason to use primes is to ensure that compound expressions are implicitly and uniquely related to their components. But with the magic of modern computers, this is unnecessary, as we have plenty of data storage and information representation implementations that simply store the relations explicitly (not to mention indexing them, enforcing uniqueness constraints, etc.).

In any case, the geometric (or perhaps you meant topological) properties of the objects are independent of the specific primes used, so "figuring out which primes to use initially" is a bit of a non sequitur.

[jonathanstrange]

And, did you find something?