|
|
|
|
|
by Chris2048
1658 days ago
|
|
I didn't say the courts couldn't interpret the constitution, but "living document" doesn't need to imply vague - RvW carved out a limited clarification without supplying a general rule of what is and isn't covered. The courts shouldn't have the power to totally skewer the constitution, ad-hoc. > having even basic knowledge on this subject That's your opinion. People debate in echo chambers all the time, if that's what you'd prefer. |
|