|
|
|
|
|
by tsimionescu
1664 days ago
|
|
Never used coderpad, but my experience holding (online/remote) code interviews is that even using an IDE with standard error highlighting and color coding is just a waste of time - people start concentrating on fixing typos and adding keywords, as they are conditioned by the red squigglies, and that just detracts from the point of the problem. Having people actually try to make the code runnable would make things so much worse... After experimenting with BYOIDE, we've stuck with online code style platforms (monotype fonts, no language-based Word-style auto-correct). This helps people focus on the problem, not the code itself, in my experience. |
|
I’m not sure I follow here. For me, programming is an iterative process: write a small chunk, test it out, write the next bit, and so on. Not being able to execute code seems like it would make that process harder, and force interviewee to essentially come up with the code “fully formed” all at once, which is hardly a useful or realistic skill.