[mootothemax]

Terrorist have already won.

Also may want to google "depopulation agenda"

Do you not see the problem with the above? If you want to successfully argue against what the TSA is doing, you need to drop the conspiracy stuff. It's not a question of being right or wrong: it's making sure that valid complaints can't be brushed aside by snide remarks such as "Yeah, whatever, he's a conspiracy nut."

And just for the avoidance of doubt, when the first page of Google is littered with links discussing the Illuminati, that does, sadly, damage your credibility.

[thornad]

Thank you for your kind message. You are right from a certain perspective. I just post the information I find interesting enough to make people think. Some people will dismiss it. There is nothig I can do for them, despite the fact that more and more conspiracy theories are turning out to be facts in one form or another. I'm not attached to any of it, nor do I believe everything in the form it is presented, and I wish people can make up their own minds.

[Goronmon]

So, this sounds like you can make up whatever you want, with no supporting evidence whatsoever, then hand-wave any criticism away by claiming you are just presenting possibilities?

I'm not sure how you think that's not a dishonest thing to do.

[anamax]

> I'm not sure how you think that's not a dishonest thing to do.

I've found that such folks fall into one of three categories.

(1) He's doing this for the attention. (2) He's incompetent. (3) He's lying to discredit his supposed cause.

[pavel_lishin]

> There is nothig I can do for them

You can focus on one topic at a time, to avoid being labeled a crank.

[thornad]

Good idea. Thanks.