[convery]

I think the clearest example would be the Gamergate page. Whole page being rewritten twice a day, conservative outlets being blacklisted as sources for not supporting the narrative while random blogs were fine, long time editors being banned from editing because they wanted it to be 'neutral', and a lot of users being banned for pointing out that a lot of the claims were not supported by the questionable sources.

For a more recent example that was posted on HN a few days ago: the proposed deletion of a page on mass-killings under Communism. Most of the arguments on the discussion page were from power-editors complaining that the page was "making Communism look bad" and that it was used for "anti-revolutionary talking-points". While the deletion is still being voted on, gives you an insight into the culture.

[matkoniecz]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletio...

> An administrator or other editor is in the process of closing this discussion. Please do not contribute further to it; the result should be posted shortly.

but nothing changed sine 29th November

[kiba]

Seems to be a non-issue WRT mass-killing under communism with lot of keep votes.

[matkoniecz]

Note that nomination for deletion is not some vote count, especially if people were encouraged elsewhere to come there and blindly vote without any prior contributions.