|
|
|
|
|
by breakfastduck
1668 days ago
|
|
> Yes, that's plausible. Should be measurable quantitively too. Can you cite some data on this? :) It's a bit bloody rich for you to come out with that attitude when your entire point revolves around your opinion of 'common sense' > Do you really think it is possible that Google runs an implementation test of a new ranking model, and deploys it, while all measurements, human labeling, and user tests show it is doing worse? Of course not! Only if you think you are smarter, could you think that Google search changed and has gotten worse. You seem to be confusing the concepts of 'Google have made their tech more profitable' and 'Google have made their search capability better'. |
|