|
|
|
|
|
|
by spullara
1666 days ago
|
|
|
I wish Amazon would stop naming things "serverless" that clearly have a well defined type and number of servers at any point. That includes Redshift Serverless and Aurora Serverless. If it has a cluster, it isn't serverless it is just autoscaling. Every time they announce a serverless product I'm assuming that it will be like Lambda and am mostly disappointed. For example, a real Aurora Serverless would be more like CockroachDB Cloud or DynamodDB. And a real Redshift Serverless would be more like BigQuery. |
|
|
What they emit is the dance routine of a sugar coated cheerleader squad.
I am of the view everything which is not a strength is obfuscated.
I have zero faith, confidence and trust is all information AWS emits.
I approach press releases and the docs on the basis that they cover up the actual implementation, and so my task is to find out what is actually going on under the hood, so I can actually make sense of what's been provided and operate it correctly (or avoid it completely, as it may be!)