|
|
|
|
|
by revolvingocelot
1664 days ago
|
|
Oh, that's wonderful, actually! Between my perception of its rarity, and the seeming ability to easily represent it with vector graphics of straight lines, I figured it was a laudable target but I see that it isn't. After all, the idea of a niche script getting more attention because of its inclusion in Unicode is exactly what I'm all excited about. I'll happily replace Ogham, in future rants, with that fucking multiocular O mentioned in a sibling to the parent. |
|