I don't see the appeal of this show. It's a prepackaged, shallow production that adds little to the actual works it undoubtedly inspires and gets much from, FKMT's manga.
The interesting thing to me is its popularity. Back in 2007, the same people that are now singing praises to SG would not have looked twice at Kaiji. In fact, I bet that had SG not been popular, the very same people would not watch it or allow themselves to enjoy it.
In other words, it seems to me that it first had to be publicly announced as 'popular', before people would consider watching it thus actually making it popular.
Back in 2007, Netflix wasn't a globally available streaming service and they were still sending out DVDs.
> would not have looked twice at Kaiji
I still wouldn't, it's a cartoon, I'm not into cartoons.
> it first had to be publicly announced as 'popular'
I didn't figure out it was popular until after I finished watching the show. Meanwhile, while watching the show, I was telling all my friends about how much I liked it and recommended it to them.
Your comment reeks of "I have superior taste and people who watch Squid Game are sheep". Just accept that some people might just really like this show while not being interested in the Manga you enjoy.
It is more of a lamentation of the fact that people's opinions of things are significantly affected by the perceived popularity of those things. I guess the benign explanation is that people are more likely to invest time into something that is recommended by many people they believe they have a lot in common with, but I think it runs deeper than that.
I suspect it applies to a significantly lesser degree to the HN audience, who know well that unpopular things can be well worth investing the time into and so for whom popularity is less of a useful metric; if anything, popular things tend to appeal to the lower common denominator and so popularity is often a negative indicator.
And that's what bothers me so much about those types of people, disliking because something is popular and then thinking that's better than liking something because it's popular. They're just doing the same thing, but they're following a different crowd. A more negative, gate keeping crowd at that.
I've never liked Game of Thrones. Game of Thrones was popular. Those things are separate facts and I will never go on the internet to tell people that Game of Thrones was bad because there's some obscure book or movie that might have some resemblance to the story line. I just didn't like it, I ignore it and enjoy the things I do like. It's really that simple.
Yes. Basically it is a re-branded, re-heated and re-packaged entertainment version of today's rat race.
Unfortunately, lots of people are just easily impressed by what influencers are watching or what is 'trending' these days. So they follow the hype squad around; like sheep.
It is great for Netflix's business since they have a successful hit, but count me out of the hype squad; since I simply cut through the hype.
No, it is not. It is objectively good. Tons of people have tried to make films like that and have failed. It's not a matter of rehashing the same old ideas and hopefully the writer hits the lottery and can enjoy never ending days on the beach.
It's fun, it's well produced, the acting is decent, the children's games add a fun twist. It's a great way to spend a couple of hours over the weekend. And it's way, way better than most of the stuff that gets released on Netflix.
Not every movie has to be a work of art with a truly original story. If that were the case, non of the most successful movies of the past decade(s) should really exist.
In other words, it seems to me that it first had to be publicly announced as 'popular', before people would consider watching it thus actually making it popular.