Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wutbrodo 1662 days ago
Yes, high-quality free products tend to try to find ways to fund themselves that involve appeals to their users. It's beyond ludicrous to find this a "sad state of affairs".
1 comments

If only there was some sort of "free high quality product" operating system that existed and proved this asinine defense of capitalism wrong
That'd be nice.

But all we got is Linux on the desktop...

Comedy is truth and pain.
>If only there was some sort of "free high quality product" operating system that existed and proved this asinine defense of capitalism wrong

The only reason Linux is popular on servers is because it has huge corporate sponsorship. Big players figured it it's more beneficial for their bottom line to commoditize the backend infrastructure and invest in OSS. Same is happening with developer tools.

It's not happening with anything consumer facing because everyone wants to take their angle at capitalising on the market. I can't think of quality user facing OSS that isn't aimed at developers or isn't trying to capitalise on the users somehow. Scratch that - blender is the only one I can think of - these guys are an amazing exception.

Keepass, Calibre, and 7-zip come to mind.
I won't argue these projects aren't quality because they certainly do the job, but they obviously lack polish of commercial software. Eg. despite looking into kepass I still chose to pay for 1password, just for the convenience.
VLC and OBS as well.
VLC is a good point I forgot about it. AFAIK OBS is sponsored by streaming platforms - I think it's another case of comoditizing the infrastructure.
Another free product is the online dictionary! You may want to look up the word "tend", and the lack of universality it implies.