| This prototype is a failure of both design and usability. It's an offense and a joke against anyone who expects to be able to interact with a machine in an efficient and intelligent manner. - It's ugly as hell - A beginner is bombarded with way too many things to click on - An expert is annoyed by useless buttons and waste of space Sure, you can turn it off, but who wants to configure and reconfigure UI preferences for the rest of their lives (sidenote: reminds me of eclipse)? Sensible defaults, please. Contrast this with Apple, whose designs often define what good design and usability means. In their apps: - The appearance is simple, well-designed, elegant - The only actions present are those deemed most necessary to the user - Tons of functionality is hidden under shortcut keys, modifier clicks and context menus for expert users (after years on OS X, I still discover hidden elegance as a result of their zealous attention to detail) |
Are these two statements different or restating the same thing with a different perception:
>> after years on OS X, I still discover hidden elegance
and something like:
"It takes me years to find some features because they're so well hidden, and perhaps unintuitive."