[hunterb123]

> There's information in the other direction now. https://news.yahoo.com/vaccine-confers-better-protection-tha...

The way they conducted that study was terrible, read the qualifications and the limitations in the discussion at the bottom.

Personally the Israeli study looks a lot more sound.

[spurgu]

Here's an analysis going over the two: https://brownstone.org/articles/a-review-and-autopsy-of-two-...

[ceejayoz]

That's a heavily biased think tank. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Tucker#COVID-19_pandem...

[spurgu]

Sigh, what isn't biased these days? No need to poison the well, the article is clear and sound (to me at least) regardless of who wrote it and why. Do you have any arguments against it? Or your own better analysis of the two studies?

[spurgu]

It really annoys me how people disregard what "the other side" is saying just because it's them saying it. Just adds to the polarization. And it annoys me because I used to do the same.

[hunterb123]

> Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.

You may want to refute the points instead of attacking the source.

What did you take issue with in their analysis?

[spurgu]

Maybe this is a less biased source? Dr John Campbell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bamaEMftg4