| >Your argument says we should be doing this forever. Yes, I did say this is a possibility. I don't think it's likely, but it is a possibility. >We never took this kind of moral grandstanding before. Why are we doing this for this one specific virus? This is the first virus with this sort of reach in the era of modern science. It's pretty simple - we have never before had a virus that has infected and killed this many people while also having an understanding that masking cuts down on transmission rates. >I’m sorry, your argument just doesn’t make sense. You disagreeing with it doesn't mean it doesn't make sense, it just means that you, for whatever reason, value people not having to wear a mask over cutting down on the loss of human life during a global pandemic. >You are arguing we should always be masked forever. If we live in a state of perpetual covid-esque pandemic from now until forever, yes, that would be a perfectly prudent thing to do. |