|
I guess my point is that you don’t seem to know much about watches, and are basing your view on a caricature of ‘rich people’. To my eye, some watches certainly do look like silly baubles, but that is a question of taste. For me, personally I look at the life of someone like Roger Smith, and envy his craftsmanship and dedication to mastery. I see a great deal of similarity between him, and say John Carmack - as dedicated masters of their medium. I would like to own a Roger Smith watch, partly because it’s beautiful, and partly because I would like to live in a world where more people get to develop their skills, and where skills are passed on, and artistry is encouraged. Of course it’s terrible that more people don’t have the opportunity to do this, but that doesn’t have anything to do with watches. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_W._Smith Yes, it’s easier for the rich to possess art than the poor, of course. No, that doesn’t mean art is only about the rich. |
However, most people use such baublage to signify success and wealth, appropriately or not.
I don't think it snobbish (inversely or otherwise) for me to think that this is a sad squandering of resource and a more than slightly horrid aspect of the human character.