Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Abishek_Muthian 1664 days ago
It's likely that it means messaging apps from the same brand should be interoperable i.e. Messenger message should reach WhatsApp and vice-versa but it needn't reach Signal, Telegram.

Fun fact, I had an interoperable network between leading chat apps Messenger <-> Telegram <-> Viber <-> LINE back in 2017 on top of which we ran a privacy focused dating platform[1]. It was built using bot APIs of these platforms.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeuL8_Qinhs
1 comments
gmueckl 1664 days ago
That's not what the draft says. If a provider or service has been identified as a gatekeeper per the criteria laid out in the draft, they need to make the service interoperable with services of other "business users" upon request (that is, other companies). So Signal and Telegram could approach Facebook and ask them for access to some federation-like API to Messenger and WhatsApp and Facebook would be legally required to provide that.

In fact, thinking about the exact wording, there might potentially be a loophole that would allow Messenger and WhatsApp to stay incompatible because they're different services by the same provider. But IANAL.

link
Abishek_Muthian 1664 days ago
If that's the case then I stand corrected, Thanks. It just sounds too good to be true, But if consumer protection is the goal then it's what makes most sense.

Still I'm skeptical that this draft would see it's light as a law as it is, iMessage is one of the main pillars of Apple ecosystem; Many in U.S. have told me that they must use iPhone as everyone is on iMessage there and I feel Apple will throw everything it has to prevent it being interoperable with WhatsApp in EU which has significant user-base there.

link