|
|
|
|
|
by vimacs2
1661 days ago
|
|
OP is referencing an open air habitat so a comparison with the ISS doesn't make sense. Open air designs do actually work once you scale up the size of the habitat enough. This is where we get the idea of Bishop rings which use a wall a hundred or so km in height to keep the air in. Mckendree cylinders (which are a supersized version of O'Neil cylinders) can also have end caps that are open provided you have a high enough wall. The main advantage of open air designs is it allows you to use aerobreaking when approaching the habitat which could be a significant save in fuel. |
|