|
|
|
|
|
by howdydoo
1675 days ago
|
|
I always thought of the last panel as an initially silly-sounding answer that could still be considered correct in some unexpected way. In this case it fits, because if you compile with `-Os`, xlatb is probably the ideal output. I doubt llvm can output xlatb, but I'd be pleasantly surprised if it could |
|
If space efficiency (or fitting in cache) are important, then this instruction being more compact but having worse execution performance could be a good tradeoff!