[nh2]

I also use bup for a long time, but found that for very large server backups I'm hitting performance problems (both in time and memory usage).

I'm currently evaluating `bupstash` (also written in Rust) as a replacment. It's faster and uses a lot less memory, but is younger and thus lacks some features.

Here is somebody's benchmark of bupstas (unfortunately not including `bup`): https://acha.ninja/blog/encrypted_backup_shootout/

The `bupstash` author is super responsive on Gitter/Matrix, it may make sense to join there to discuss approaches/findings together.

I would really like to eventually have deduplication-as-a-library, to make it easier to put into programs like nix, or also other programs, e.g. for versioned "Save" functionality in software like Blender or Meshlab that work with huge files and for which diff-based incremental saving is more difficult/fragile to implement than deduplcating snapshot based saving.

[pdimitar]

I used `bupstash` and evaluated it for a while. I am looking to do 5+ offsite backups of a small personal directory to services that offer 5GB of cloud space for free.

`bupstash` lacked good compression. I settled with `borg` because I could use `zstd` compression with it. Currently at 60 snapshots of the directory and the `borg` repo directory is at ~1.52GB out of 5GB quota. The source directory is ~12.19GB uncompressed. Very happy with `borg` + `zstd` and how they handle my scenario.

I liked `bupstash` a lot, and the author is responsive and friendly. But I won't be giving it another try until it implements much more aggressive compression compared to what it can do now. It's a shame, I really wanted to use it.

I do recognize that for many other scenarios `bupstash` is very solid though.

[lathiat]

Borg has been working great for me with zstd.