[thinkingemote]

>No one is going to be given the vaccine by force

Yet.

Remember that people said over a year ago that "no one will be denied access to facilities without a vaccine passport, that's ridiculous". And yet later on it has become somewhat accepted and even desired. If it saves lives and reduces harm perhaps people will also support force being used? There is no limit anymore, seems to me. Any means necessary seems to be supported by the majority of the world's populations.

All we can say with certainty is "well, not yet".

[gambiting]

>>Remember that people said over a year ago that "no one will be denied access to facilities without a vaccine passport, that's ridiculous".

I definitely didn't say that, I was very firmly in the group that thinks people should absolutely be denied access to things without the vaccine passport.

Again, just like I'm fully in support of kindergardens not accepting kids that haven't been vaccinated - it's just not ok.

At the same time I don't want force to be used against anyone, denying access is enough.

[peteradio]

Its not right to deny rights to people who already have immunity.

[gambiting]

Sure, and some countries recognize that too - a covid passport means either being vaccinated or having immunity. Both should be an option.