[not-elite]

> That is the most stupid thing I've read in a while.

Arrogance.

It takes 10 lines of Python to compute a multiplicative inverse mod p, using arbitrary precision integers. [1] Try doing the same thing with nothing but x86 assembly and Volume 2 of Knuth's AOCP.

It's a useful, humbling exercise.

[1] https://karpathy.github.io/2021/06/21/blockchain/

[wiseowise]

That doesn't make it no-code or low-code. It's just a high level programming language that's more efficient at solving one problem than another.

[rvense]

You're really just arguing about the definition of the word "code".

[Chris2048]

arguably, higher level language use higher level general code features, where-as no/lo-code solutions are using specialised/domain features.

This would make them similar to a framework like chef/ansible/puppet that requires a large library of "knowledge" on how to do various things (all written in traditional low/high-level general code).