[huahaiy]

I think I am pretty qualified to make my declaration, since it is about user experience.

I also do know a lot about IR, because I taught Information Retrieval class for 3 years when I was teaching in university, I read research papers, and I just come up with a new search algorithm.

It's just that some people cannot accept that there are people who can cross fields with ease, make contributions quickly, and move on to the next field that pit their interests.

Yes, I am one of those people. In addition to HCI, I also published in the following areas: VR, DB, NLP, IR and Psychology. Sorry to hurt your feelings, but it is what it is. Accept it and move on.

[tgv]

That's not a new search algorithm. It's about the second one people have come up with. First version: all documents containing all search terms. Second version: counting frequency in document. Since you taught IR for three years, I'm surprised there's no mention of other relevant heuristics, or measuring against benchmarks.

[huahaiy]

Again, you miss the novelty of the algorithm due to your smugness. I have updated the article to point out explicitly where the novelty is at. You completely ignored that. In fact, I believe you didn't even read that far before your jumping out to write this dismissal.

I wrote a blog post for lay people to read. I am under no obligation to do an extensive literature review, I only need to mention the essentials.

You just cannot seem to swallow the fact that someone who does not have a Ph.D in IR or computational linguistics can come in to contribute quickly then move on to something else. It hurts your feelings deeply, does it? Heed my advice, just get over it, don't take your degree or your specialization too seriously. It does not matter.