| Can't handle discussion and evidence opposing your worldview? That's the mark of a weak mind. If only we could shut down all contrary evidence to the expert consensus. That would totally lead to a better world. The truth is really the opposite. Diversity of opinion, contrary arguments, and unusual new ideas are the engine of progress. This article, and Substack in general, is a great example of how true progress is made. It could be wrong, maybe even it likely is wrong if it contradicts the consensus, but damn the consensus! This is not a safe space where we only discuss approved ideas! The point of research is to find flaws in the consensus. How is that possible if contrary ideas can never be discussed? Think like a scientist! And have the decency to allow others to form their own opinion rather than forcing one on them. Think: What has been gained by censorship versus what has been lost? You are simply on the wrong side of history if you don't enthusiastically support free discussion, especially for the ideas that are marginalized. The better policy is affirmative action for disfavored ideas. |