I think they would, but mostly just because of selection effects. There aren't so many minorities in rural areas, and the ones that end up there probably had better-than-usual reasons to end up in rural parts.
I've lived in rural areas and they would say that when you get called "the good colored folk" by the white people in the area that there's a reason for that "good" description and it's not because they believe in racial equality.
it's difficult to imagine parts of the world being different than the part of the world you live in and/or the depiction of the world portrayed by the media.
Spoiler alert: I have done this and they disagree with you.
Look, everything is contextual -- your rural area may be superior in some respects to the ones I've been to. But you also shouldn't assume that your experience is universal.
Edited to add: if you haven't been to a big city in a while, you should take a trip. They're not generally the hellholes you've been led to believe by right-wing news media.
In my experience rural Americans tend to live in abject terror of just how fine they would feel were they treated as they treat minorities and it is compounded by a deep down understanding they are already the minority, it just has not arrived there yet.
I wish I could alleviate their fear. Given the opportunity, people are people, good & bad do not stratify in any meaningful way along the arbitrary lines that get drawn.
I used to live in rural America. I don't any more. There are reasons for that.
Cities usually kill people by ignoring them until they die. Exceptions are so rare that they become the stuff of history books.
The big upside of cities is that nobody cares enough about you to actually hate you. If you're running away from something, that can be pretty inviting.