Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sleavey 1682 days ago
Didn't they get banned or there was a campaign to ban them after someone was killed by someone riding a fixie, in London?
1 comments

You're probably thinking of Charle Alliston who killed someone on Old St and got 18 months for it - to be road legal, fixed-gear bikes must still have a front brake, and have at least since the fifties, A fixed gear counts as a back brake but you must have two for redundancy.
Charlie Alliston should have been using a front brake, but a few things got lost in the media frenzy:

- More pedestrians are killed by motor vehicle than bikes in London BY FAR

- More cyclists are killed by motor vehicles than bikes in London BY FAR

- More motorists are killed by motor vehicles than bikes in London BY FAR

It was incredibly depressing to watch people spend so much attention on one (pretty rare!) case rather the real sources of road danger in the city.

It's not news when dog bites man. And based on Wikipedia, it seems that men bite dogs more often than cyclist kill other people in accidents.
On top of that, the associated pollution kills far more people, contributes to climate change, and causes tons of respiratory illness.
This. Most cyclist fatalities in London are caused by Heavy Good Vehicles illegally overtaking and then turning and therefore trapping the poor cyclist in the blind spot. Nothing to do with the wheel hub design or bicycle braking system.