|
|
|
|
|
by floatingatoll
1685 days ago
|
|
Whatever motivated that negligence, my point is that a simple request that seems reasonable - “put in a hood” - is, when considered in context, factual evidence of gross negligence on the part of city inspectors. The city risks being held financially liable for bringing the restaurant up to its own code standards if it fails to enforce those standards over time, no matter the cause of the negligence. I hope that someone someday pursues this to discovery against San Francisco, so that we may better understand the cause. |
|