|
|
|
|
|
by ggm
1680 days ago
|
|
Writing about fnsrgle is hard. You want to explain the floofies but whe you spronge the blaly nobody can rebinnle the magrafan. Look, it's simple. The magrafan is the problem because speexzle but watrea 24 Avery haalso fnsrgle. This is why reading about Haskell is hard. Because you need to explain fnsrgle using ordinary words, and then explain floofing, but you cannot use blintzes to explain floofing, or concepts like higher order types, or applicative, or any of a multitude of concepts which are alas given, to understand Haskell. Happy rebinnle-ing |
|