|
|
|
|
|
by hunterb123
1683 days ago
|
|
I'd say the burden of proof is on those who claimed it is biologically dead. I'd find it hard to believe no microbial life was in the Thames. You find life in the most harsh environments, geysers, volcano vents, miles deep in mines. But in reality the statement "biologically dead" is a hyperbole from the media meaning fish and animals weren't present, not microbes or biological life in general. GP was making a tongue-in-cheek statement against that hyperbole I believe. I'll see my way out... |
|