|
|
|
|
|
by sgpl
1676 days ago
|
|
Maybe there's nothing wrong with this submission and maybe I'm a skeptic but definitely seems like a gamed submission. Submission by a new account, another new account posts that this is the best piece they've read about this game, front page in less than 30min... Also the title seems eerily similar to a good primer on the company that I had read earlier this year by twitter.com/packym that was titled, "Infinite Revenue, Infinite Possibilities." That was a super bullish piece though so perhaps the growth is tapering off as the title of this piece seems to suggest. Anyways - I'd highly recommend that piece [0] for a primer on the company and catalysts for its growth (if anyone reading this isn't familiar with this company and wants a deeper dive + more context around blockchains+games). [0] https://www.notboring.co/p/infinity-revenue-infinity-possibi... |
|
The other comments objecting to $2k for “public data” are off base —- this is for studio execs who need context and dont have random blockchain devs sitting around to do “free” on chain analysis
Edit: Packy’s piece is great too but this one has newer data to comment on. Packy’s also selling stuff (his placed written ads and his substack), so there’s no real difference in “purity” there