[isitdopamine]

> we found a number of units with batteries so drained, Playdate wouldn’t power on at all — and couldn’t be charged

Wait, wait, wait… Are they saying that if the battery is too drained the device will not charge? It that’s the case, it’s a terrible design decision!

Also, isn’t the + shaped control a Nintendo patent?

[philistine]

Oh hey no one answered your query about the patent on the D-pad; that patent is long expired. (https://patents.google.com/patent/US4687200A/en)

[notRobot]

Firstly, it wasn't a design "decision". It was an unplanned, unexpected thing.

Secondly, did you even read past that paragraph? They got a new supplier and replaced the batteries with better ones in every device.

[isitdopamine]

You didn’t understand my comment.

Their write up seems to imply that the device wouldn’t charge if the battery is completely drained.

It happens sometimes in cheap devices in which the charging logic is managed in software, but it’s a terrible design decision.

If that’s the case, a better battery will mitigate the problem but the terrible design remains!

[avian]

> It happens sometimes in cheap devices in which the charging logic is managed in software, but it’s a terrible design decision.

In my experience, this is a pretty common practice, not limited to cheap devices. Many modern battery-driven devices I've looked at closely (for example: e-book readers, smartphones, ...) cannot bootstrap from a completely dead battery. They have to bring up the CPU, which then brings up the PMIC, before it can start charging the battery.

The difference between well-designed and less well-designed devices is mostly in how well they protect the battery from discharging beyond the point where this minimal bootstrap process stops working.

[cube00]

I was surprised that a device could drain to the point where it could never be charged again, thanks for the possible explanation.