|
|
|
|
|
|
by Wolfenstein98k
1686 days ago
|
|
|
I thought this was saying "please don't shop this Black Friday" lol. They're saying "please don't use Wirecutter this BF". I already don't, but I'll do my part and continue not to. Edit: I read some of the testimony and I'm confused. For instance: "I was excited to join Wirecutter as the Times announced a major DEI report and plan as central to its mission. The most powerful thing the Times and Wirecutter can do in the name of diversity and equity is to pay more and do away with NDAs." Why is it "powerful", in the name of DEI, to pay this person more and help their future job prospects? They already work for a massive and powerful corporation - it hardly helps DEI to give their well-paid workers another pay rise and revoke NDAs. |
|
|
A couple things: we don't know how much they're paid, so it's not really possible to pass judgment on what they're asking for in terms of comp. Secondly, it's pretty well documented that the racial inequality in America also applies to familial wealth and income, which further exacerbates inequality. There's a pretty good argument to be made IMO that more needs to be done to bridge the racial income disparity gap.