Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by disambiguation 1686 days ago
I haven't seen any convincing science on "long covid" but I'm open to having my mind changed.

Further, it comes off as tone deaf to care about long term COVID effects but not that of vaccines.

I agree we're overflowing with data, my stance is data-driven.

I think it's wrong to discount whistleblowers, but you can pick and choose who you think is worth listening too.

1 comments

Well you seem like an unbiased interpreter of the available data. Good luck.
Well I'm not making any friends or profit off of this stance, so I'm not sure what my ulterior motive could be?

I think it's fair to challenge my _ability_ as an interpreter more than bias, but rarely do we have the opportunity to defer important life altering decisions to others and still retain confidence they will prioritize what's best for us over themselves.