[omegalulw]

> I have to disagree with this as it relies on the assumption that every commit on a branch is logical and descriptive. In my experience a lot of PRs will have small commits that have poor names as they go through a review process.

There's your problem. Code reviews should not allow such commits to pass through.

[t3h2mas]

> Code reviews should not allow such commits to pass through.

Are you suggesting that your code review process has a stage for combing through commit messages? What does this look like? If the third commit message of 15 isn't up to par what happens?

[derekperkins]

You ask them to fix the commit message. Every git GUI should support that by now, so it should be a 1 minute fix, even for junior devs.