[pdq]

I believe he's referring to the other party, with videos like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcRVR63dnDA

And this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8tYl5C9PufY

[LarrySellers]

Good point, there's clearly no conspiracy against the right.

...but the recent video of Biden getting sworn in has more likes than dislikes! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2305DGsceE

He's been president for nearly a year. Youtube is really bad at this conspiracy stuff I guess.

[klipklop]

I do believe political pressure is what is partially guiding this move.

[LarrySellers]

Do you have any evidence at all?

[klipklop]

Can only speculate based on the various complaints the party had about all the downvotes the WH channel gets.

Do you think anybody below the VP level of YouTube would be told? Guess what, no google employee talked about PRISM either.

[LarrySellers]

Agreed, you have no evidence for your claim, so it can be dismissed entirely.

[klipklop]

Yes we should totally take google at their word when they say it's not politically motivated.

They can say whatever reasoning they want, that does not necessarily make it true. Google has a well defined history of lying publicly or hiding the things they do. Dragonfly, PRISM... These things take brave whistle blowers that have their lives ruined to reveal.

If I said, "I am going to eat this fried twinkie because it is for my health" would you take that as a factual statement (that twinkies are healthy) just because some PR department repeated it on my behalf? Google saying they are not doing this on behalf of the current administration means nothing. Nobody reasonable expect them to really be honest with the public/users anymore.