Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by njarboe 1687 days ago
Or why not both? The materials to make each doesn't overlap much so building on does not jack up the price of building the other.
1 comments

I think if it’s governments fitting the bill, there is a limit to resources. But agree you could pursue both.

Nuclear power is still kind of fossil fuels though, so it’s just kicking the can down the road… but it’s a big kick.