Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jhylau 1684 days ago
Vogtle nuclear delayed again due to shoddy work that needs redoing, raising cost to >$27.8 billion.

New timeline means 16 to 17 years between planning and operation, thus 16-17 years of CO2 and pollution before a single kWh

https://www.wabe.org/new-delay-for-georgia-nuclear-reactors-...

we are running out of time! the transition to WWS is faster and cheaper.

see: https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/WWS-...

2 comments

Oh stop with the "it's too slow" already: https://twitter.com/steeve/status/1426103525050814464?s=20
I'm not sure what's been debunked. The US does not have the construction capabilities of 1970s France. And for that matter, neither does France, as is being proven in Flamanville and in Olkiluoto, Finland.

Perhaps we can invite Slovakia or Russia to build in other countries, but there's no knowing if they could train local workforces accomplish what they have.

UK is taking decades to buils a train line, and its gonna cost as much as the moon landings, all of them.

Maybe this whole outsourcing of all technical skills and manufacturing actually has something to do with it?

Maybe treating staff as disposable cpgs hollows out skills untill the companies can no longer do anything right?

I suspect the real reason is "maybe turning profit-skimming by intermediate layers of management into an art-form, makes any large-scale project-costs trend to infinity".

HS2 spent ungodly sums on "consulting" and management fees to do stuff that, back in the day, would have probably been carried out by a couple of commandeered civil servants. But I'm sure all their Word reports have nice headings and lots of "holistic" something.

The best time to invest in nuclear was 40 years ago. The second best time is now.