[nuerow]

> Where did I "blame" race? And for what?

Please don't play dumb. You accused, and I quote, "it's disingenuous to dismiss historical facts about what white people have done in Africa on the basis that it hurts white people in Africa's feelings."

> People who are white have done horrible things in Africa.

Please don't play dumb. You know very well your racist comment was a blanked accusation targeted at entire ethnical groups.

If you are honestly interested in learning about the crimes against humanity committed within the scope of imperialist agendas, you'll learn very well that the root cause is very specific. If on the other hand you're just invested in mindlessly spewing racist comments then you should really take a look at what you are doing.

[dang]

You've been breaking the site guidelines so badly and so frequently—not just in this hellish flamewar, but elsewhere too, and quite egregiously—that I've banned this account.

Please don't create accounts to break HN's rules with.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[LurkingPenguin]

> Please don't play dumb. You accused, and I quote, "it's disingenuous to dismiss historical facts about what white people have done in Africa on the basis that it hurts white people in Africa's feelings."

That statement itself isn't "blaming" white people for anything. It's merely stating that it is not reasonable to avoid not-so-pretty aspects of the history of white Europeans in Africa on the basis that some white people in Africa (and Europe) don't want to discuss them.

> You know very well your racist comment was a blanked accusation targeted at entire ethnical groups.

What is the accusation? You conveniently left out the next sentence:

> People who are black have done horrible things in Africa.

As I stated, you can't blame white people for all that ails Africa. But it's also disingenuous to dismiss the malign influence white Europeans have had on the continent. To pretend that racism wasn't a fundamental part of the belief systems of white European imperialists is simply absurd.

White European imperialists believed themselves superior to the people in the lands they conquered, and they engaged in concerted efforts to convince the people they oppressed of their inferiority to the white Europeans as well. Are you totally ignorant of the widely-promoted and widely-held notion that Africans were barbarians incapable of governing themselves and were better off as slaves?[1]

Cecil Rhodes (know who he is?) himself wrote:

> I contend that we are the finest race in the world and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race. Just fancy those parts that are at present inhabited by the most despicable specimens of human beings what an alteration there would be if they were brought under Anglo-Saxon influence, look again at the extra employment a new country added to our dominions gives.

Now, I'm not suggesting that we "cancel" the Rhodes Scholarship, but would you find it racist to talk about the fact that Cecil Rhodes was a racist?

Also, I think you meant "ethnic" groups, not "ethnical" groups.

> If you are honestly interested in learning about the crimes against humanity committed within the scope of imperialist agendas, you'll learn very well that the root cause is very specific.

It seems to me you're preferring to talk about "imperialist agendas" without talking about who the imperialists were. Pray tell, who were the imperialists?

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/sep/08/europe...

[dang]

You broke the site guidelines badly and egregiously in this hellish flamewar. We ban accounts that do that.

I'm not going to ban you for this because I'm not seeing it consistently in your history. But if you do it again, we will. Seriously not cool.

It also looks like you're mostly using HN to argue about ideological and politically inflammatory topics, which is not the intended use of this site. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit more to heart, we'd be grateful. The idea here is curious conversation. Not battle, and certainly not flamewar.