|
|
|
|
|
|
by tjpick
6495 days ago
|
|
|
it's not awesome. It's acceptable and you can get a job done with it as far as I can see. The author hypothesises that people choose plain PHP over drupal because they are scared off by the many configuration options. I'd say it's a case of Drupal having a lot of crap that you don't need. I'm not sure what the problem was, but Drupal is not the correct solution. |
|
|
If by 'lot of crap' you are referring to things like a user account system with a detailed permissions, a flexible taxonomy system (categories, tags..) or perhaps the wide rage of modules that are available then I'd have to disagree. I personally have reinvented the wheel enough times to believe that coding up yet another user account system isn't an efficient use of my time.
I'm not sure what your problem is. But I say Drupal is a viable solution to a high percentage of web site requirements including many social sites.