[Traster]

Let me ask you, let's say that I get one of these artists to draw up a contract and sell me one of their peices of art. Do you think it will command the same value, more value or less value than the equivalent NFT associated with it?

Becuase I take a look at this and it looks to me like all of this commercial activity has basically nothing to do with the art. I would kind of get it if you pointed to me to a guy whose selling peices of art for a few bucks, maybe $50-100 and selling a decent number of them who you know... like the art. But what market is this? These aren't art collectors who are just using the new medium is it. They're not fans of the art. They don't have thousands invested in traditional collections. They're not going to buy the same art, but off-chain. So is this really anything to do with paying artists at all? Who are these people who are suddenly rushing to pay thousands of dollars to artists?

Is this "StarryNight" who paid $2000 for this NFT excited to be supporting xcopy. Or is it the account of the venture capital fund of the same name? That's not exactly the story of giving power to creators that we were being told is it?

I think the problem here on HN is actually the opposite of what you're stating- the second you do do an ounce of research these claims start looking more and more fishy.