|
|
|
|
|
by freediver
1688 days ago
|
|
There are close to billion devices with an ad-blocker today and chance is they would still continue to do so even if all ads magically became privacy-respecting (for example just 90s type banners). Thing is people really do not like or want ads on the web. I agree that eliminating all advertising is not the goal, but moving to a world where I am advertised on an opt-in basis sounds like a much better proposition. Imagine reverse cookie notice windows, where I have to fill in a form with my interests to start getting ads. |
|
Most ad blockers don't affect simple 90s type banner ads.
I use an ad blocker. I still get contextual ads on duckduckgo.com based on my search keywords. Most ad blockers focus on links to known global, privacy invading ad networks. No link, no block.
I don't mind simple context based ads. What I object to; and what I think most people object to, are personalized ads driven by privacy invasion.
Ads without proper context are mostly just an annoyance anyway and the associated personal data collection is subject to abuse. The only reasonable approach for a consumer is to block this crap until advertisers stop throwing money at it.