[acdha]

While it’s true that scientists want to be open to new possibilities, that doesn’t mean naively accepting that known charlatans like Berensen are acting in good faith when they pick up a particular idea to see if they can monetize it.

The linked paper is a case study of n=3 patients. There quite possibly is a mechanism where patients with certain pre-existing might want to monitor more closely but, as the paper notes, this appears to be quite rare given the massive number of people who’ve been vaccinated. The medical community monitors these things closely and I’m sure of two things: if there is something clinically useful which comes out of this it won’t be ignored, and anything useful will come out of work by medical professionals rather than a right-wing crank who will shamelessly attempt to harness a dead man’s reputation to boost his career.