[LurkingPenguin]

This is what I like to call a "Valley Bubble" comment.

There are lots of people working in tech-related jobs at/for companies not named Facebook, Amazon, Apple or Google who earn well above average incomes.

How to make this look like underachievement? Claim that these people are fewer in number than they actually are and suggest that there are hoards of 20-something FAANG engineers making $500,000/year+ such that a freelancer pulling in $120,000 is somehow a loser compared to his peers.

> There are other routes to moderate wealth but few as easy and reliable.

If it was as easy as showing up with a comp sci degree and a heartbeat, why is prepping for whiteboarding interviews even a thing?

[asdfasgasdgasdg]

You're reading a lot into my comment that's not there. I don't have any disdain for the freelancer in question, and I think it's quite an achievement to be earning $120k without training in the given field. But you said

> "Why someone should feel compelled to pretend that they problem solve differently to ace a whiteboard in this market is beyond me."

and I'm making observations that I feel adequately explain why someone might want to pass a whiteboard interview at a big tech company. It's completely valid to not want to do that as well, but you said that you couldn't understand why someone would want to, and I've explained why someone might.

> If it was as easy as showing up with a comp sci degree and a heartbeat, why is prepping for whiteboarding interviews even a thing?

I didn't say it was easy. I just said there are not other routes I'm aware of that are easier.

[LurkingPenguin]

> I don't have any disdain for the freelancer in question, and I think it's quite an achievement to be earning $120k without training in the given field.

I was only pointing out that there are a lot more people who earn really good incomes in tech-related fields who don't have formal STEM educations. This isn't as uncommon as your comments seem to suggest.

Frankly, a lot of web and mobile app development doesn't require a computer science degree, nor is a formal computer science education the only form of "training" there is. Heck, assuming computer science curriculums are the same as when I was college-aged, I wouldn't even consider them "training" for a typical development job today.

> I didn't say it was easy. I just said there are not other routes I'm aware of that are easier.

I've dated both a lawyer (who worked at a Big Law firm) and an investment banker (who worked at a bulge bracket firm) in the earliest stages of their careers. Frankly, I don't think making a really good living in these professions is any more difficult than "FAANG worker". Different people have different aptitudes and when someone aligns his or her aptitudes to his or her career choices, everything sort of looks "easy".

[asdfasgasdgasdg]

> Frankly, I don't think making a really good living in these professions is any more difficult than "FAANG worker."

That doesn't match the reports of work life balance I have heard from practitioners of those professions vs. practitioners of programming. But I don't have any reliable, objective evidence to share on this point of view.