[tsherr]

I'd suggest that any article written "without any knowledge of the topic" is of zero value. I'd define spam as zero value posts/messages. Ergo, it's spam. Not sure how you can argue it isn't.

Not attacking you, I'm just interested in your defence of this sort of thing

[mattscyoc]

"without any knowledge on the topic" refers to the time BEFORE the user uses the tool. During and after the tool the user will certainly have knowledge after reading and curating the questions and answers, right? Just like, before you read about a topic you "have no knowledge" but after, you might say that you have some now.

[city41]

The issue is you have no knowledge of the subject. You said so yourself:

> without ANY writing (outside of deleting and organizing), and without ANY knowledge of the topics or SEO target keywords

So your content can't be trusted. It's being curated by someone who has no idea of its accuracy.

[tsherr]

So when you say "without any knowledge" you meant, you picked a topic you didn't understand, researched it thoroughly, then made the post?

So you didn't weeks/months becoming an expert before making the post?

Then it's not spam.

[tata71]

Same, for the record.