|
|
|
|
|
|
by tomp
1681 days ago
|
|
|
You're misinterpreting the study; it compares previously infected with previously infected AND vaccinated. It doesn't say anything about previously infected VS vaccinated but not infected (and there are studies that claim "natural" immunity is more effective; hell even original J&J trial data suggests that!) |
|
|
Luckily for the CDC they just recently happened to get data proving that naive vaccinees are 5x better protected than recovered unvaccinated against infection. The study is horrible, with so many issues and conflict of interests... but who cares, the CDC published it, it even has a shiny banner for news media to share around!