For most of these, Wolfram Vertical Line Alpha seems to give reasonable results. However, for the third one, because I'm in Argentina, it helpfully converts US$79.80 into Argentine pesos, getting an answer that's off by about a factor of 2: AR$7969.44. As https://preciodolarblue.com.ar/ explains, the current bid and ask prices for the dollar are AR$195 and AR$199. Wolfram Vertical Line Alpha is apparently using the "official" rate of AR$99.45 or so; this is the rate at which the government converts your dollars into pesos if you are an exporter, but you cannot convert your pesos into dollars at this rate without special permission, granted, for example, if you are going on vacation to Disney World.
Sometimes even this doesn't work. I used verbatim search and got back results which didn't contain the word I looked for.
I then just sadly wonder how the heck this could be possible and resignedly slowly shake my head.
I could wish for a feature where I double-double quote the word to empathically indicate that this word must exist in the result and not left out under any circumstances. But then again I am sure that the search quality will continue to decline and even double-double, triple-quote, quadruple-quote words &c won't help anymore. Sort of a quote inflation.
This is correct. In this query, the '*' is being disregarded. Then, I assume, more people on the internet discuss 48 and 6 in the context of long division than in the context of multiplication.
It is. Try searching for 16*9 for the good reason it shows both the calculator, and then links to 16:9 and 16x9 aspect ratio content.
It's reasonable to think that the calculator already answered the question, and I'm not looking for pages on the simple multiplication once I've already seen the answer.
Imagine the uproar if those results didn't come up because a bunch of children's math quizzes were found instead.
What we'll discover is there is a team dedicated to determining when to display the calculator. Then there will be another team entirely that picks how to interpret the query for website results. The two teams will never have met, spoken, exchanged information between the two. The team searching websites will mysteriously have never thought that someone might search a webpage for a math equation.
As a non-native speaker I would welcome more "grammar nazis" in places where well educated native speakers can be found.
One of the reasons children learn new languages quite rapidly is because they get corrected the whole time.
Not correcting people hinders actually their progress in language learning… Even if it might seem impolite it's the one thing that helps a lot, if not even most, in mastering a foreign language!
So thanks for being a "grammar nazi". We need people like you.
(No, that doesn't apply to the causal typo. But I guess most people can differentiate such a thing form true grammar and spelling mistakes; especially if that are "typical" mistakes).
The link says it can still be lead. Lede seemingly came about fo random reasons. I learned the opposite today. That I can still write lead instead of lede. M
No it isn't. "Lede" is a neologism arising from people convincing themselves they had inside information. It's been "burying the lead" as long as the phrase has existed. Your own link explains that.
I love WA and use it all the time, but it's so hard to know when a query will work and when it won't. When it fails it fails hilariously.
Here's some of my favorite queries:
- https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2.2+bagels%2Fday+*+ave...
- https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=time+dilation+given+v+...
- https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=400+miles+%2F+20mpg+*+...
- https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=US+unemployment+rate+v...
- https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=warp+speed+6+in+deep+s...