[Aeolun]

> making a decision like that based on how the documentation for the framework looks isn't actually reasonable

How much effort someone puts into their documentation tells me a lot about how much effort they put into the product in general, and user-friendliness in particular.

[colejohnson66]

Not really.

Single developer projects tend to put more effort into the code than the documentation, but that doesn’t mean the product isn’t good.

Startups can afford to put massive amounts into documentation and marketing while having a terrible product.

And big businesses can be anything.

[yurishimo]

Are you implying Tailwind is operating as the traditional startup? It's the exact opposite. Fully profitable right now with 8+ employees and what I would assume is tons of the money in the bank having listened to tons of interviews by Adam Wathan.

The Tailwind team is just insanely talented and committed to quality at every level. Not everything is a SV game of marketing and smoke screens.

[colejohnson66]

> Are you implying Tailwind is operating as the traditional startup?

No. I’m simply saying that the quality of a website does not indicate quality of the product being shown. The only thing that will indicate if a product is good or not is testing it.

Tailwind obviously has great marketing and a great developer base, but not everything is the same.