|
|
|
|
|
|
by nybble41
1681 days ago
|
|
|
The author/publisher of the smart contract is not the counterparty to the transaction or the source of funds; publishing their information, even assuming it's available, wouldn't satisfy the requirements. 6050l should be repealed altogether, not extended to "digital assets". It was wrong when it was first passed and it hasn't gotten any better since. |
|
|