|
|
|
|
|
|
by allertonm
5413 days ago
|
|
|
Perhaps so, but in this case you don't have to look too closely. Autonomy & SAP have similar customers, true. But the suggestion in Gruber's post is that the purchase of Autonomy is a substitute for a purchase of SAP. Which is a bit like saying the purchase of a front drivers side door mirror is a substitute for the purchase of a car. (Downvotes too, jeez.) |
|
|
You're being downvoted because you are arguing a point that no one is making.
No one is saying that SAP and Autonomy are in the same business.
It's almost like you're choosing not to get it, just so you can talk about the differences between SAP and Autonomy.
This is, more or less, the thesis of Gruber's post:
> The thing is, Apotheker’s relevant experience was serving as CEO of SAP. What’s SAP? SAP is an enterprise software and consulting company. Honestly, we all should have seen this coming. You don’t bring in an enterprise consulting guy to turn around a PC and device maker. You bring in an enterprise consulting guy to turn a PC and device maker into an enterprise consulting company.
The only portion of the post where Gruber makes even a remotely questionable comparison is this statement:
> Autonomy — a company I’d never heard of before but which more or less sounds like a rival to SAP
He off-handedly likens Autonomy to SAP. Maybe that's wrong, but it doesn't matter.
Follow us all here:
Fact: HP was a hardware products company.
Fact: Apotheker was head of SAP, an "enterprise consulting" company.
Inference: Apotheker is going to take HP in an "enterprise consulting" direction, not a "hardware products" direction.
Arguing whether Autonomy and SAP are the same business is tangential to the point.