|
|
|
|
|
by trasz
1683 days ago
|
|
So yeah, the additional problems this introduces do have workarounds. Still, the point remains: this adds new problems for no gain (for me). As for the track record: we are talking about a company that can't properly implement basic password authentication, see my first comment. And no, I'm not interested for possible reasons/excuses why is it so; what matters is that it doesn't work _for me_. |
|
It doesn't, though. Go actually read the article this time, not just the headline.
> for no gain (for me).
Sure. There's no way your system could ever be compromised. It's not like you actually click any of the links on HN, right?
> we are talking about a company that can't properly implement basic password authentication
[citation needed]